+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 20

Thread: rating the lineup player by player

  1. #1
    Terrible pun mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    off the hook
    Posts
    56,547
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    195

    rating the lineup player by player

    for discussion's sake, using a 1-5 scale for the lineup. feel free to play with it how you want, what i was thinking was something like

    5 - top level player at that particular position
    4 - better than average player at that position
    3 - average player at that position
    2 - below average player at that position
    1 - awful (no pun intended) player at that position

    lf - nix/brown/mayberry
    cf - victorino
    rf - pence
    3b - polanco
    ss - rollins
    2b - utley
    1b - wigginton/thome/mayberry/howard
    c - ruiz

    i would say for discussion's sake to just compare at their particular position?
    Quote Originally Posted by pp999 View Post
    MT you don't post as much anymore but when you do it's clear you are the absolute worst
    Quote Originally Posted by KrukNut View Post
    it's posts like that that really make me hate MT
    Quote Originally Posted by mpt View Post
    Classic MT

  2. #2
    King Breather John Gulbunney has a reputation beyond repute John Gulbunney has a reputation beyond repute John Gulbunney has a reputation beyond repute John Gulbunney has a reputation beyond repute John Gulbunney has a reputation beyond repute John Gulbunney has a reputation beyond repute John Gulbunney has a reputation beyond repute John Gulbunney has a reputation beyond repute John Gulbunney has a reputation beyond repute John Gulbunney has a reputation beyond repute John Gulbunney has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    97.5 and 94.1
    Posts
    55,868
    Rep Power
    502

  3. #3
    offensively on a scale of 1-10

    lf - nix/brown/mayberry 4
    cf - victorino 7.5
    rf - pence 7.5
    3b - polanco 2.75
    ss - rollins 5.25
    2b - utley 7.25
    1b - wigginton/thome/mayberry/howard 6.5 if Howard misses a month or two
    c - ruiz 3.75
    Copyright 2011 ADK Innovations, LLC dba Philly Sports Central ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

  4. #4
    Terrible pun mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    off the hook
    Posts
    56,547
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    195
    those look surprisingly optimistic i would say, pp. very fair numbers.
    Quote Originally Posted by pp999 View Post
    MT you don't post as much anymore but when you do it's clear you are the absolute worst
    Quote Originally Posted by KrukNut View Post
    it's posts like that that really make me hate MT
    Quote Originally Posted by mpt View Post
    Classic MT

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by mtcal View Post
    for discussion's sake, using a 1-5 scale for the lineup. feel free to play with it how you want, what i was thinking was something like

    5 - top level player at that particular position
    4 - better than average player at that position
    3 - average player at that position
    2 - below average player at that position
    1 - awful (no pun intended) player at that position

    lf - nix/brown/mayberry
    cf - victorino
    rf - pence
    3b - polanco
    ss - rollins
    2b - utley
    1b - wigginton/thome/mayberry/howard
    c - ruiz

    i would say for discussion's sake to just compare at their particular position?
    lf - nix/brown/mayberry - 2
    cf - victorino - 4
    rf - pence - 3
    3b - polanco - 1
    ss - rollins - 4
    2b - utley - 4
    1b - wigginton/thome/mayberry/howard - 3
    c - ruiz - 2

  6. #6
    My take below...

    Quote Originally Posted by mtcal View Post
    for discussion's sake, using a 1-5 scale for the lineup. feel free to play with it how you want, what i was thinking was something like

    5 - top level player at that particular position
    4 - better than average player at that position
    3 - average player at that position
    2 - below average player at that position
    1 - awful (no pun intended) player at that position

    lf - nix/brown/mayberry - 2 if less Brown/3 if more Brown
    cf - victorino - 4
    rf - pence - 4
    3b - polanco - 2
    ss - rollins - 3
    2b - utley - 4 (Don't know if he will ever be the old Utley, but still better than most at his position)
    1b - wigginton/thome/mayberry/howard - 3 if less Howard/4 if more Howard
    c - ruiz - 3 (offense leaves alot to be desired; but can't doubt the calling game stuff, defensive abilities, etc)

    i would say for discussion's sake to just compare at their particular position?

  7. #7
    Terrible pun mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    off the hook
    Posts
    56,547
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    195
    Quote Originally Posted by Phred View Post
    lf - nix/brown/mayberry - 2
    cf - victorino - 4
    rf - pence - 3
    3b - polanco - 1
    ss - rollins - 4
    2b - utley - 4
    1b - wigginton/thome/mayberry/howard - 3
    c - ruiz - 2
    pence a 3 but rollins a 4? kinda surprising.
    Quote Originally Posted by pp999 View Post
    MT you don't post as much anymore but when you do it's clear you are the absolute worst
    Quote Originally Posted by KrukNut View Post
    it's posts like that that really make me hate MT
    Quote Originally Posted by mpt View Post
    Classic MT

  8. #8
    rollins position is much weaker
    lol ruben amaro jr

  9. #9
    Terrible pun mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal has a reputation beyond repute mtcal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    off the hook
    Posts
    56,547
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    195
    true.

    but both were 5th in the league in OPS in their positions.
    Quote Originally Posted by pp999 View Post
    MT you don't post as much anymore but when you do it's clear you are the absolute worst
    Quote Originally Posted by KrukNut View Post
    it's posts like that that really make me hate MT
    Quote Originally Posted by mpt View Post
    Classic MT

  10. #10
    lf - nix/brown/mayberry - 2 brown won't be up here
    cf - victorino - 4
    rf - pence - 4
    3b - polanco - 1
    ss - rollins - 3
    2b - utley - 4
    1b - wigginton/thome/mayberry/howard - 2
    c - ruiz - 3

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by mtcal View Post
    pence a 3 but rollins a 4? kinda surprising.
    These were my quick and dirty perceptions rather a deep stat based analysis. I did take into consideration depth of position and performance over career. Also, I guess that I have always been a Rollins fan and have never been really sold on Pence. My bias probably gave Rollins the edge there.

  12. #12
    It's Gonna Get Funner... Tiburon has a reputation beyond repute Tiburon has a reputation beyond repute Tiburon has a reputation beyond repute Tiburon has a reputation beyond repute Tiburon has a reputation beyond repute Tiburon has a reputation beyond repute Tiburon has a reputation beyond repute Tiburon has a reputation beyond repute Tiburon has a reputation beyond repute Tiburon has a reputation beyond repute Tiburon has a reputation beyond repute Tiburon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Wenonah, NJ, USA
    Posts
    2,768
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by mtcal View Post
    for discussion's sake, using a 1-5 scale for the lineup. feel free to play with it how you want, what i was thinking was something like

    5 - top level player at that particular position
    4 - better than average player at that position
    3 - average player at that position
    2 - below average player at that position
    1 - awful (no pun intended) player at that position
    lf - nix/brown/mayberry--2
    cf - victorino--4
    rf - pence--4
    3b - polanco--2
    ss - rollins--4
    2b - utley--4
    1b - wigginton/thome/mayberry/howard--3
    c - ruiz--3

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts